Global Witness Report Sheds Light on ExxonMobil’s Questionable Dealings in Nigeria
** READ THE FULL REPORT HERE **
Abuja, Nigeria — A major oil deal struck by
ExxonMobil with the Nigerian Government is being investigated by Nigeria’s
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, a law enforcement agency that
investigates high-level corruption, Global Witness reveals today. The case highlights
the need for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to create strong
transparency rules for oil companies, which are due for release by this Monday,
The probe centers on a protracted and controversial deal agreed by ExxonMobil and the Nigerian Government in 2009 to renew three lucrative oil licences, which at the time accounted for around a quarter of Nigeria’s entire oil production. ExxonMobil reportedly agreed to pay $600 million to renew the licences and construct a power plant at a cost of $900 million to the company, making a total contribution of $1.5 billion. Yet documents seen by Global Witness indicate the Nigerian Government may have valued the licenses at $2.55 billion, and that the Chinese oil major CNOOC offered to pay $3.75 billion for the same licences – over six times the amount reportedly paid by ExxonMobil.
“We welcome the investigation. We need answers as to why the former President Yar’Adua’s Government awarded the licences to Exxon at a seemingly knock-down rate, despite being offered what appears to be a far superior deal from a credible competitor,” said Dominic Eagleton, a senior campaigner with Global Witness.
The new SEC rules will require U.S.-listed oil, gas and mining companies to disclose details of the hundreds of billions of dollars they pay to governments every year, such as taxes, royalties and licence fees, wherever they operate in the world. Currently there is very little transparency for oil and mineral companies’ payments to governments, which leaves these vast public revenues vulnerable to corruption. In Nigeria alone, an estimated $400 billion in oil revenues has been lost to corruption and mismanagement since 1960.
The U.S. rules aim to deter corruption and cut poverty by enabling citizens to monitor payments and hold both governments and companies to account for how the money is used. Yet ExxonMobil has been lobbying U.S. policymakers to prevent the new rules from shedding light on precisely the kind of deal it carried out in Nigeria that is now being investigated by anti-corruption enforcers.
“This shows precisely why U.S. policymakers should reject Exxon’s call to water down the transparency rules and allow companies to hide payments made on individual oil deals, such as Exxon’s licence renewal in Nigeria. This would defeat the purpose of the rules. It would prevent citizens from holding governments and companies to account, and rob the world of one of our best chances of cutting the poverty that plagues so many resource-rich countries like Nigeria,” Eagleton continued.
Media reports state that Rilwanu Lukman, Nigeria’s senior-most Oil Minister at the time of Exxon’s deal, refused to endorse the agreement, stating that in his opinion the $600 million renewal fee was too low and would deprive Nigeria of the full benefits the licences. The difference between Exxon’s reported renewal fee and CNOOC’s counter-offer of $3.75 billion is more than Nigeria’s entire health and education budget combined.
“The EU, Canada and Norway have all introduced laws that require oil companies to disclose payments separately from each project. It’s in the interests of citizens, governments and industry alike for the U.S. to follow suit and join the new global reporting standard,” Eagleton added.
Global Witness approached ExxonMobil with a request for comment on the Nigerian deal. The company stated that following extensive discussions with the Nigerian Government to renew the licences an agreement was reached and legally executed, and that in reaching the agreement ExxonMobil fully complied with Nigerian law. ExxonMobil also stated that its investments have generated significant income for Nigeria and promoted economic and social development in the country.
Andy StepanianUS Communications
Dominic EagletonSenior Campaigner, Fossil Gas
General/out of hours media enquiries
Notes to editor:
1. A Global Witness briefing on the ExxonMobil deal is available here.
2. Mobil Producing Nigeria, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ExxonMobil, renewed its 40% interest in the offshore Oil Mining Licences (OMLs) 67, 68 and 70 in November 2009. The remaining 60% stake was held by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, a government-owned company. Media reports state that OMLs 67, 68 and 70 produced around 550,000 to 580,000 barrels of oil per day, equivalent to around a quarter of Nigeria’s production at the time of the deal. See Reuters, ‘Exxon signs Nigeria oil renewals, dispute ends’, February 22, 2012: http://uk.reuters.com/article/exxon-nigeria-idUKL5E8DM8NP20120222.
3. The SEC is scheduled to release a final rule to implement Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act by June 27, 2016. The SEC has proposed that the rules should require covered companies to disclose their payments to governments separately for each extraction project they have a controlling interest in (‘project-by-project’ reporting). See the SEC’s proposed rules: https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-277.html.
4. ExxonMobil is calling on the SEC to create rules that would allow covered companies to aggregate individual oil licences for the purposes of reporting, and withhold the reporting companies’ identities from public view. This ‘compilations’ model of anonymous reporting payments to governments would almost certainly have resulted in ExxonMobil’s payment to renew OMLs 67, 68 and 70 being impossible to identify or attribute to ExxonMobil. ExxonMobil has made several submissions to the SEC in support of the compilations model, most recently in March 2016: https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-25-15/s72515-57.pdf. According to SEC records, ExxonMobil staff met with SEC staff to discuss the Section 1504 rules on November 3, 2015 http://www.sec.gov/comments/df-title-xv/resource-extraction-issuers/resourceextractionissuers-97.pdf; April 23, 2014 http://www.sec.gov/comments/df-title-xv/resource-extraction-issuers/resourceextractionissuers-38.pdf; and October 11, 2013: http://www.sec.gov/comments/df-title-xv/resource-extraction-issuers/resourceextractionissuers-7.pdf.
5. For 2016, Nigeria’s health budget was set at approximately $1.1 billion, and its education budget approximately $1.8 billion: http://www.nigerianmonitor.com/68567/
You might also like
Shell and Eni's Misadventures in NigeriaIn 2011, Shell and Eni paid US$1.1bn for one of West Africa’s largest oil fields, situated off the coast of Nigeria, but the money did not benefit the country’s citizens.
Revenue disclosure laws – Cardin-Lugar and the global transparency standardGlobal movement to end the corruption that blights resource-rich countries is gathering pace.
Corruption and money launderingIll-gotten gains don’t disappear by themselves. Dictators, warlords and other criminals need ways to hide their identity and move dirty cash around the world.