Read the entire report and responses here.
February 3, 2020: Guyana’s Stabroek license – one of the world’s biggest oil finds in years – will cause the country to lose out on up to US$55 billion, according to a new Global Witness investigation based on an OpenOil analysis. Global Witness calls on Guyanese officials to demand a new deal from Exxon.
The report, Signed
Away, shows how Exxon’s aggressive negotiations with inexperienced officials
led to an exploitative deal that deprives Guyana of billions. Exxon’s original license for the Stabroek oil block – off Guyana’s
Caribbean coast – dates back to 1999. However, in April 2016, after Exxon found
oil in the block, the company set out to pressure Guyanese officials to sign a
rushed, new contract to renew its oil license – knowing that its existing
license was running out.
Evidence seen by Global Witness also shows how Natural
Resources Minister Raphael Trotman visited Exxon’s Texas headquarters during
the negotiations on an all-expense-paid lavish trip, flying first class and
eating at the company’s exclusive restaurant.
Exxon’s internal policy states that staff should
consider whether gifts to officials may “improperly influence pending business
decisions.” Exxon denies any wrongdoing, saying it is “committed to the highest
standards of business conduct, and we follow all local laws and regulations.”
Trotman may have also suffered from a possible conflict
of interest as he has been close political allies with one of Exxon’s Guyanese
lawyers. The lawyer – Nigel Hughes – has denied he represented Exxon on the
deal, but admitted that his firm has represented Exxon since 2009 and that he
has worked for the company on other matters.
Global Witness does not have evidence that
Trotman’s Stabroek negotiations were influenced – unwittingly or otherwise – by
his expensive Texas trip or his ties to Hughes. But the relationship between
Trotman, Hughes, and Exxon should be investigated.
“Guyana should renegotiate Stabroek to get a
better deal and the government must investigate those who approved Exxon’s oil
licenses,” said Jonathan Gant, Senior Campaigner at Global Witness. “Our
analysis shows that Exxon would likely pay much more in tax if operating in
another country. Yet Exxon aggressively pushed a potentially-conflicted
official to sign a rushed contract. Guyana should not lose out on this
staggering sum – up to US$55 billion. This is money that can save lives and
With an annual budget of US$1.4 billion, there
is much that Guyana can do with the extra billions in revenue it should get
from the Exxon deal. An analysis by OpenOil, commissioned by Global Witness,
shows that Guyana would lose out on an average of US$1.3 billion per year.
“People in Guyana have told us that this is
money that should be used to meet critical development needs – building
schools, roads, and fixing Guyana’s crumbling sea defenses,” said Gant. “A full
90% of Guyanese people live along the country’s coast, and estimates put the
bill of rebuilding Guyana’s sea wall at US$3 billion.”
In letters to Global Witness and OpenOil, Exxon
disputed OpenOil’s findings, saying that they did not account for Guyana’s
“frontier” status as an oil producer. However, the company did not comment on
the detail of OpenOil’s fiscal analysis. Trotman also told Global Witness that
getting maximum revenues from Exxon was not the government’s main aim and the
country needed Exxon to help protect its borders from Venezuela. Guyana’s Foreign Minister Carl Greenidge
argued that any analysis must focus not only on financial data from
international oil deals but on Guyana’s strategic considerations and the risk
to Exxon of military conflict in the area.
OpenOil studied reports of the financial terms of
government oil contracts around the world, including by the International
Monetary Fund. These reports show that, based on international data, Guyana is
receiving a lower profit share from Exxon than many other international oil
The Stabroek deal is not the only questionable license
that Exxon obtained. Evidence seen by Global Witness also shows that the two
other Guyanese oil licenses – called Kaieteur and Canje – raise red flags for corruption. They were
initially awarded to companies with limited experience that flipped shares of
their licenses to Exxon before doing any real work.
The official who awarded Kaieteur and Canje –
former Natural Resources Minister Robert Persaud – issued the licenses just before
leaving office in 2015 and has shown an extraordinary degree of ignorance about
the ultimate owners of the winning companies. The companies who initially
obtained Kaieteur and Canje have denied wrongdoing, as have Exxon and Persaud.
“Guyana’s major oil find risks being turned into
a curse for the country. While the world seeks to mitigate the effects of the
climate crisis – effects that the Guyanese people know so well – the government
could use these lost funds from Exxon to build a sustainable economy and
infrastructure to protect against the climate emergency,” said Gant.
Global Witness calls on the Guyanese government to:
- Renegotiate Exxon’s Stabroek license to get the
revenues Guyana needs to build a strong economy following the country’s Green
State Development Strategy.
- Ban all drilling and extraction in areas other than the 15 discoveries Exxon has made to help fight the climate emergency.
- Investigate the process by which the Stabroek
license was negotiated.
- Investigate officials and companies involved in the Kaieteur and Canje licenses to determine if there were any irregularities in the awarding of those blocks.
Notes to editor:
See the full report Signed Away: How Exxon’s exploitative deal deprived Guyana of up to
US$55 billion here.
Exxon’s license was analyzed by the financial
experts at OpenOil. A full version of the report – commissioned by Global
Witness and entitled How much revenue will Guyana lose out on in Stabroek? – can be found here.
For Exxon’s April 2015 Guidelines to conflicts of interest policy, directorships policy, and gifts and entertainment policy, visit https://careers.exxonmobil.com/-/media/files/offer-letter-attachments/canguidelinestocoidirectorshipsgepolicyenglishapr2015.pdf.
You might also like
Oil, Gas & MiningReport
Signed Away: How Exxon’s exploitative deal deprived Guyana of up to US$55 billion
Exxon’s aggressive tactics with inexperienced Guyanese officials will cause Guyana to lose up to US$55 billion in an exploitative oil contract, according to a new analysis.
Oil, Gas & MiningPress release
Exxon complicit in oil sector corruption in Liberia
A new Global Witness investigation has uncovered US oil giant Exxon’s complicity in oil sector corruption in Liberia, with the purchase of an oil block the company knew was tainted by corruption.
Oil, Gas & MiningBlog post
Timeline: The corporate corruption trial of the century
One year ago, one of the most important corruption trials ever began in Milan. In the dock are senior executives at two of the worlds biggest oil companies - Royal Dutch Shell and Eni.