Global Witness - Breaking the links between natural resources, conflict and corruption
Global Witness Comment in the Financial Times
Press Release – 16/01/2009
To secure its energy, Europe must end opacity
Global Witness comment. Financial Times, January 15, 2009
Many commentators have seen the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine as an argument about gas prices. But according to no less an authority than Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, speaking on January 8: ‘[What the Ukrainians] are fighting for today is not the gas price, but a chance to keep this or that middleman in order to use the dividends for personal ends and personal enrichment.' The Ukrainian prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, has made similar comments about the motivations of ‘senior political officials' in Ukraine.
This barrage of accusations points to a deeper problem for the European Union: the relationship between opacity and threats to the security of its oil and gas supplies. Europe is sourcing energy from an arc of countries that starts in western Africa, though the Middle East and round to the former Soviet Union.
Many European policymakers seem to have assumed in the past - and possibly still do - that however rotten the governance of these countries, and however opaque their finances, Europe can count on their energy supplies. Civil wars in Africa and years of clumsy autocracy in Central Asia have rarely stopped the oil and gas from flowing.
But the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute suggests this assumption is unwise. Without greater transparency, it is not possible to understand how the trade is structured, who really controls the energy flow and who reaps the lucrative benefits. And without knowing these things, it is impossible to understand the risk of supply disruptions.
Although Putin mentioned no names, the ‘middleman' in the gas trade since mid-2004 has been the secretive Swiss-based RosUkrEnergo. This company, half-owned by Gazprom, did not even identify its two Ukrainian shareholders until after Global Witness drew attention to one of them, businessman Dmitry Firtash, in April 2006.
RosUkrEnergo came out of an agreement between two sovereign states, Russia and Ukraine, but Ukraine is not a shareholder. The company has reported post-tax profits of nearly $800 million a year, although it is still unclear what it does in the gas trade that could not be done by Gazprom itself.
This point is worth emphasising: RosUkrEnergo has sat astride one of the most strategic and lucrative energy supply routes into the EU while revealing very little about its activities or, for nearly two years, even naming all its shareholders
This question of transparency goes far beyond Ukraine. Nigeria has oil and gas in vast quantities. In September 2008, the European Commission offered financial support to Nigeria for a gas pipeline across the Sahara to Europe. Yet Nigeria is also highly opaque, despite recent reforms, and corruption is an undoubted cause of the bloody rebellion in the Niger Delta which has cut into oil exports. The risks in other volatile countries in Africa and Asia may not be much lower.
So what can be done? The EU has attributes which, wielded intelligently, could give it some influence over the countries that supply its energy. Europe is a major market, a source of commercial finance and development aid and, more subtly, a source of legitimacy for governments abroad that often rest on shaky political foundations.
As Europeans, we need to know who supplies our oil and gas. We need to know who owns the companies and what qualifies them to play the role that they do. We need to know how they price their energy and how much revenue they pay. We need to be assured that they came by their contracts in an open and transparent manner.
So the EU should use its regulatory power to ensure that companies which trade in its energy markets, or make use of its financial system, or raise capital in its securities markets, are subject to strict disclosure requirements. For too long, some European banks have provided cover for shadowy interests and opaque financial flows.
The EU can also exert pressure for greater transparency through offers of aid and expertise to energy-supplying countries. The EU is, after all, the world's biggest aid donor.
If the EU wants to guarantee reliable supplies, then it has little choice but to insist that Russia, Ukraine and other suppliers meet basic international standards of governance and ensure that the energy trade is open to scrutiny.
For more information call Diarmid O'Sullivan on +44 (0)207 561 6364 or Tom Mayne on +44(0) 7939 460357
Copyright. The Financial Times Limited 2009
For more information on background of the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute, read It's a Gas (4/06) or our open letter to Gazprom CEO Alexey Miller (8/1/09)
Downloads
An Open letter to Gazprom (8/1/09) Global Witness Financial Times Comment
Latest Publications
July 2010
The Bribery Act: what it means for business
Briefing paper produced by the Chartered Institute of Managment Accountants in collaboration with Global Witness outlining the implications for accountants and businesses worldwide of the new 2010 UK Bribery Act.
Global Witness takes UK government to court for failing to list UK companies trading Congo conflict minerals for UN sanctions
Global Witness has made an application to the High Court for a judicial review of the British government is acting unlawfully in refusing to put forward eligible UK companies and individuals trading in Congolese ‘conflict minerals' for targeted UN sanctions, said campaign group Global Witness today
Рисковый бизнес: кто контролирует Казахмыс ПЛС?
Russian translation of 'Risky Business' report.
Russkyi perevod doklada 'Riskovyi biznes.'
Letter on civil society participation in climate change and deforestation talks
Global Witness has signed a letter along with 39 other organisations complaining about the short notice given to civil society groups regarding participation in a meeting of the Interim REDD+ Partnership in Brasilia from 14-15 July. The non-transparent process and restrictions on participation violate the spirit and letter of the agreement and represent a serious false start.
U.S. passes landmark reforms on resource transparency
Global Witness strongly welcomes a ground-breaking new bill, passed by the U.S. Senate today, which will help to lift the curse of corruption and conflict from poor countries that are rich in oil and minerals by promoting greater public oversight and responsible trading practices.
Crisis averted by last-minute deal on Zimbabwe diamonds, but campaigners warn that biggest test lies ahead
A deal reached by the Kimberley Process diamond certification scheme could pave the way for reinforced oversight of diamond production in Zimbabwe, while allowing for limited exports. The deal is far from perfect and its success or otherwise will be determined by what the main players do next.
Renewing the Pledge: Re-Engaging the Guarantors to the Sudanese Comprehensive Peace Agreement
With six months until a referendum on Southern independence, Sudan is alarmingly unprepared. Renewing the Pledge is published by a coalition of 26 NGOs, including Global Witness from Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and the US. The report calls calls for urgent action from African heads of state who will meet shortly at a major summit of the African Union in Uganda from 19 – 27 July.
Six months before critical referendum, Sudan alarmingly unprepared
With six months until a referendum on Southern independence, Sudan is alarmingly unprepared according to a new report published today by a global coalition of 26 humanitarian and human rights organisations. The report calls for urgent action from African heads of state at the African Union summit.
Kazakh company on FTSE 100 a risk for investors, says Global Witness
Kazakhmys plc, a FTSE 100 company which mines copper in the Central Asian nation of Kazakhstan, failed to declare potentially key information about its shareholders and directors when it listed on the London Stock Exchange, thereby exposing investors to unquantifiable risk, warned Global Witness in a report published today.
Bail for Zimbabwe diamond activist welcome, but charges must be dropped
We welcome the decision by the Harare High Court to grant bail to Zimbawean human rights campaogner, Farai Maguwu, who has been in custody since 3 June. The spurious charges against Fairai must now be droppped immediately.
Risky Business: Kazakhstan, Kazakhmys plc and the London Stock Exchange
Kazakhmys plc, a FTSE 100 company which mines copper in the Central Asian nation of Kazakhstan, failed to declare potentially key information about its shareholders and directors when it listed on the London Stock Exchange, thereby exposing investors to unquantifiable risk.
This report raises serious concerns about London's "light-touch" market regulation and argues that it would be in the public interest for companies like Kazakhmys to be required to provide much more information to investors about political risk.
Congo Now! petition calls on UK to do more to end violence in DRC
Congo Now! is a coalition of non-governmental organisations, politicians and Congolese activists who are calling for the UK government to do more to end the cycle of violence and suffering in the resource-rich country.
Global Witness welcomes new EU law banning illegal timber
The European Parliament has introduced new legislation banning the trade of illegally sourced timber and timber products in EU member states. Global Witness warmly welcomed the reform as an important step towards cracking down on illegal logging around the world.
Do No Harm: A guide for companies sourcing from the DRC
Companies sourcing minerals and metals from conflict zones have a responsibility to ensure that they are not directly or indirectly funding human rights abuses or other crimes. Some companies claim that it is too complicated or too difficult for them to do. Global Witness has produced a guide, outlining the steps they must take.
Negotiations between north and south Sudan must include a fair and transparent oil deal
A fair and transparent arrangement for sharing and monitoring the revenues from Sudan’s oil fields should be a top priority for negotiators from north and south Sudan who begin talks today on what will happen if the south votes for independence in January’s referendum, said campaign group Global Witness.
5 Principles for a Post-Referendum Oil Deal in Sudan - briefing paper
A fair and transparent arrangement for sharing and monitoring the revenues from Sudan’s oil fields should be a top priority for negotiators from north and south Sudan who begin talks today on what will happen if the south votes for independence in January’s referendum. The January vote could see the birth of a new country: if so, it will be impoverished and heavily dependent on oil revenues, yet also dependent on former foes in north in order to export its oil. Transparency over oil revenues will be critical to preventing a return to war - this briefing paper outlines 5 principles that will be crucial in reaching such an agreement.
June 2010
Liberian debt relief welcome but better financial controls needed to prevent corruption
The decision by the World Bank to grant debt relief to Liberia under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) is welcome but more needs to be done to prevent corruption in the post-conflict country.
